Monday, October 15, 2012

The Hardest Choice


Abortion rights advocates have been de-stigmatizing abortion for 200 of the past 4000 years the procedure has been available. In the beginning of history abortion was a widely sought after procedure, normalized in society and readily available for women experiencing an unplanned pregnancy. It was not until the late 1800s that abortion began to be regulated, criminalized and policed.

Today, statistics will tell us that half a million abortions occur per year. These procedures are done in the safety of private, certified medical facilities by practicing physicians. Abortion as a civil right has been attacked so viciously in the past 200 years that coalitions have been created to defend the rights of women who have chosen or are choosing elective abortions.

Campaigns such as “1 in 3,” “Stop the War on Women” and “March for Women’s Lives,” have incited action and factions of women and men motivated to advocate for abortion rights.

In the mean time the history of adoption has been less guided as a reproductive right for women and more as a social welfare issue. The focus for the government and the populace has always on the product of the pregnancy; the child- not the families making the decision to place the child.

In the early 1900s the eugenics movement was in full force in Europe and the United States. Infants available for adoption were seen as having poor prospects in life as they came from “poor genetic endowment,” due to the fact they came from unwed or abandoned birth mothers according to the literature of the time.

Henry Herbert Goddard began a popular movement at the same time in America in which he “proved” criminality and immorality were genetically inherited. Available, adoptable infants were subsequently placed in group homes, and eventually institutionalized instead of being placed with loving available families.

A few wealthy philanthropic women of the time however felt differently about these women and infants. In 1910 the first private child placing agencies were being developed by women interested in finding homes for infants with childless families. Louise Waterman Wise, one of the founding women of the movement wrote at the time:

It is a very serious matter for the state and society to insist that a child shall remain with its natural mother merely because of its birth and that it shall be denied a thousand opportunities which adoption under the new order of life brings.”

Adoption as a social movement was on the rise!

Today, however, adoption agencies are reporting that adoptions have decreased in 2012 by 50%. Older, established independent child placing agencies are closing and statistics tell us only 125,000 women per year actually end up choosing to place their child through a court process with a family different from their own.

How, in a century, did we go from waiting infants, to waiting families? The 1973 ruling of Roe vs Wade legislation certainly made adoption a less necessary social service. You can imagine considering the stigma and negativity surrounding unplanned pregnancy why women would opt to have a safe, legal, private procedure in the comfort of their doctor’s office versus facing the scrutiny and stigma of not only carrying an unplanned pregnancy but also telling people the pregnancy would result in adoption.

When our culture has come from a century of negativity around birth parents, going so far as to suggest their genetics were “unfavorable” why or how could a modern woman possibly make the choice to place her pregnancy for adoption?

On TV we see Caitlyn and Tyler, two young teens featured on a popular MTV docudrama, struggling to process their adoption with the daughter they placed. Their episodes are filled with tears and emotional discussions reliving the day of placement. Society has told us if you choose not to parent a child you should be sufficiently devastated.

On a similar token, we see decades of legislation to restrict women’s access to abortion. When women are denied abortion they are given two stark choices; parenting or adoption.

One option leaves the responsibility of raising a child she may not be able to responsibly raise squarely on her shoulders. The other option we have been taught to see as the weaker, less favorable option. This belief goes all the way back to the eugenics movement discussed earlier in this post. What woman could possibly find herself in this position and how could she be able to make this choice? She is either pitied, counseled, or shunned even by our modern society.

Today, women still make 82% of what men in similar positions earn. Women who earn only a high school degree typically earn around $2000 per month before taxes, whereas women with bachelor’s and master’s degrees typically earn between $3800-4400 per month. Women with children spend approximately 40% more time out of the workforce than men, providing care to children. This factor can also be economically devastating to a single mother, especially one making minimum wages with inflexible hourly employment. Women who are asked or forced by society to parent a child before they are prepared are at a disadvantage time after time when it comes to economic advancement.

The abortion movement proves that women have been making hard decisions about their personal futures for 4000 years. When will our society and community be able to accept adoption as a hard but important decision unprepared families may sometimes need to make.

Friday, September 7, 2012

Gotcha Day!


If you have known anyone who has gone through the process of adopting, or have done it yourself, then you are well aware of what an exciting, scary, and amazing journey adopting truly is. In the  adoption world one of the most celebrated days in this journey is referred to as the "Gotcha Day." This day signifies the beginning of the lifelong journey between parents and children.  We want to share with everyone the "Gotcha Day" story of Lynn and Nate, an amazing couple that has been documenting their incredible adoption story since the beginning.  Be sure to check out the link to their blog for a more in-depth look into their story and for current updates on their family adventures!
And please let us know if you have a "Gotcha Day" story that you would like highlighted on our blog by emailing it to us at choicenetworkohio@gmail.com !


http://fullofinsanity.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

One Mother's Story

Becoming a parent is an exciting, terrifying and unpredictable time in anyone's life.  Whether you are a birth parent or adoptive there are two universal truths: 1) A lot of well meaning people will give you a lot of good intentioned advice, and 2) No two stories are alike.  The following is one woman's story of her journey into parenthood and becoming a mom:

The first time I met my daughter, Madison, she wasn’t mine yet and I wasn’t sure she would ever be. I stared into her solemn face and looked shyly at her mother, Jessica.
“Can I pick her up?” I asked.
“Of course,” she said proudly.
There was nothing about her that was familiar — not her round face, her tuft of hair, the heft of her body. When I gazed at her, I felt enormous tenderness and the quiet stirring of potential love, but I didn’t know her. And I was afraid to look too closely because I knew that, just as I had felt the shift and click of my son’s life falling into place after his birth seven years before, so Jessica was coming to know Madison. All those months, she had thought she was carrying just any baby when all along it was Madison. She was saying to her daughter what I had said to my son: “Oh, it was you!”
Adoption social workers say that every woman needs to say hello to her baby before she can know if she can say goodbye. But I wanted to say hello to Madison, too. I wanted to let myself fall in love with her. I wanted to unwrap her and examine each little limb, bury my face in her neck, let my fingers trail across her features. But she wasn’t mine. I grieved her even as I knew she wasn’t mine to grieve.
Three days after Madison’s birth I watched my husband buckle her into the car seat, and then I climbed into the back seat beside her. I thought about Jessica, who we’d left sobbing in the maternity ward. I knew her arms were aching for her daughter, the daughter that was now ours.
“She’s beautiful,” I said to my husband. He glanced into the rearview mirror. “I know,” he said. We sped through the gray morning, heading home.
“I feel like a kidnapper,” I told him.
“I know,” he said.
- – - – - – - – - – - -
My husband and I came to open adoption filled with hopeful naiveté. We tried for several years (and several miscarriages) to have a second child, but when our infertility doctor said we might need more extensive treatment, we decided to walk away. A few months later, we began to explore adoption. Foster-to-adopt, we decided, would be too emotionally risky for ourselves and, more importantly, for our then 6-year-old son. International adoption was too expensive. But when we found domestic infant adoption through a local nonprofit agency, we realized that we had found our way to be parents again.
We knew that our adoption would be at least semi-open. We would be sharing our vital statistics — first names, ages, religion, as well as carefully chosen pictures — with birth mothers, as per the agency’s requirements. But we wanted more. We wanted a fully open adoption with an ongoing relationship and continuing contact. We wanted holiday visits, regular phone calls and even — dare we hope — contact with the extended birth family. We felt our baby-to-be would benefit from knowing his or her origins; we considered it a birthright. We also strongly believed birth parents were due some kind of relationship with their children and with their children’s adoptive parents — if they wanted one.
We weathered the fear-mongering tales of well-intentioned friends and acquaintances, people who had watched nightly news stories of toddlers snatched by their birth parents from adoptive families who had cared for them since birth. We listened as they wondered aloud what kind of woman would have the strength to walk away from her baby and then come back for occasional visits. “What if she kidnaps the baby?” they’d say. “What if she treats you like babysitters?”
Other adoptive parents we knew chose to go abroad in part because they were alarmed by the trend toward increasing openness in domestic infant adoptions. “Won’t you feel jealous?” they’d ask. “Won’t it confuse the child? What if your child likes her more than she likes you?”
I dismissed their concerns with all of the blind optimism of someone who had waited through four years of infertility for a baby and now finally thought she might get one. “Don’t be surprised if you get placed quickly,” our social worker told us. “Most adoptive parents aren’t ready to be that open, and it’s something a lot of birth mothers look for.”
Our agency asked that each hopeful adoptive family put together what they called a profile and other adoption professionals sometimes call a “Dear Birth Mom” letter. (The reason they call it a profile, our agency explained, is that a pregnant woman considering adoption is not a birth mother; she is an expectant mother and should be respected as such.) When a woman came to the agency saying she was considering placing her child for adoption, they gathered at least five profiles to share with her. The profiles were pulled on the basis of any requirements that she might have. If a potential birth mother said she wanted an adoptive family where one parent was a teacher, only the teacher profiles would be pulled. If none of the profiles appealed to the woman, she could ask for more.
The profile contained information about us, about our path to adoption and our intentions as adoptive parents. And the profiles are usually printed out on pretty paper.
“Pretty paper?” I asked Denise, our social worker, when she gave us the instructions.
“It matters,” she said. “You’d be surprised.”
It was a lot of pressure to take to the stationery store. My son and I spent a long time analyzing our choices. I rejected the pastel baby feet as too pushy, the blue sky and clouds as too ethereal. I finally decided on white with a tasteful abstract green border. We made a dozen copies and dropped them off at the agency.
While our agency allowed “matches” as early as the seventh month, they stressed to us that a match was nothing more than a woman expressing her right to consider an adoption plan. It was not the promise of a baby, it was not a guarantee that we would be parents again.
“There is always a 50 percent chance that a woman who chooses you will change her mind,” Denise made clear. “A real baby changes things and no matter how sure she is while she’s pregnant, she will need to make that decision again once she has the baby.” It was a common refrain from the agency during our wait: “Guard your heart,” they told us. “The baby isn’t yours until the papers are signed.”
Seven months after completing our adoption homestudy, our social worker called. “There’s a woman who seems like a good fit for you, and we would like to share your profile with her.”
Jessica was 19, they told us, and African-American. The birth father, who was choosing not to be involved, was white, like us. The baby was healthy — Jessica’s prenatal care had been good. “And it says here what she’s having,” Denise added. “Do you want to know?”
We did. A girl, she told us, due April 4. A week later we got another call. Jessica wanted to meet with us.
Our agency facilitated our first meeting at a downtown restaurant. Jessica brought three of her closest friends, and we all sat across from each other fidgeting awkwardly. Jessica was polite, guarded but not shy, and greeted us with sonogram pictures of the baby she was carrying. She was due in two months and feeling good.
I liked Jessica right away. I liked her confidence and sense of humor. I liked her wide smile. And I liked how direct she was with us. “I’m going to name the baby Madison,” she told us. “You can change it later but that’s the name I’m going to give her.”
When it was time to go we exchanged phone numbers and last names. Over the next few weeks she and I talked regularly — not just about Madison but about other things, too. Politics, music, Jessica’s plans to travel and go to school. One day I hung up the phone after a particularly long conversation and told my husband, “If she decides not to place Madison, she’ll be a good mother.”
We talked about the adoption, too, about what her plans were and why she chose us to be part of it. Those reasons are complex and not ones I feel I can share here.
“You already had a son,” she said. ” I liked knowing Madison would have a brother. I also liked what you said about including me. And the paper. I liked your paper. It was tasteful.”
At the first meeting at the restaurant, Jessica told us that she knew she would want to be alone with Madison for the three days before she could legally sign the surrender. We said we understood. But the morning that Madison was born she called to say that she had changed her mind and wanted us to come in.
“I need to see you with her,” she said simply.
- – - – - – - – - – - -
Even after we arrived home with Madison, I could not get Jessica’s tears out of my mind. I felt numb. I didn’t know how to answer when people congratulated us. They saw only the happy event, but each time Madison cried I felt sure that every one of her ordinary infant sorrows was magnified by the separation from her birth mother. This was not the gauzy, soft-focus motherhood I had envisioned.
Jessica was everywhere because she was in my daughter. The shape of her brown eyes, the curve of her face — they became mixed up in my mind. During every diaper change I’d gaze at Madison’s small body and imagine how Jessica must have looked at one week old. They mirrored each other; the vulnerability of the mother who had given up her child and the child who had lost her mother.
“You need to move on,” friends said. “You need to let Jessica move on. Quit taking her phone calls. Step up and be Madison’s mother!” But no one could tell me how to be her mother when she already had a mother. I could care for her — rock her, feed her, and sing her to sleep — but something would not allow me to claim her.
Was it the phone calls? Jessica called about once a week to hear how Madison was doing and to tell me what was going on in her life. I kept my stories sweet and lively. She was working hard to put her life back in order and was forthright with me about her struggles. She missed Madison, she told me. The decision was the right one but oh, she missed her. I welcomed our talks even as I shrank from them. I felt it was my duty to hear her cry. It was the least I could do, I thought, because I had her baby. My guilt was a necessary purgatory, an inadequate payment for my privilege.
Each time, I would hang up determined to embrace Madison as my own. Jessica wanted me to be Madison’s mother, didn’t she? She chose me. She signed the papers. She had released her to me, and now I was failing her trust.
So I went through the motions. I sang to Madison so she would learn my voice. I strapped her to me and walked in circles so she would learn the rhythm of my movements. I hoped proximity would breed devotion. But I felt like a liar when we went out and people said what a pretty baby I had. Not my baby, I wanted to tell them, anxious not to take Jessica’s credit.
“She even looks like you!” some gushed. Of course this wasn’t true. Her smooth coffee-with-cream skin is nothing like my own rosy complexion. Such was their strong determination to fit her to our family.
“She looks just like her birth mother,” I’d reply. I wanted them to see Jessica, to acknowledge her. I couldn’t stand to have her obliterated, even in casual conversation. It was if they were trying to deny the truth of Madison, the fact of who she was beyond being my adoptive daughter. I didn’t want to pretend that she came to us without her own history. But at the same time, polite society seemed to want to dismiss her origins. Per United States law, Madison’s post-adoption birth certificate even listed me as the woman who gave birth to her.
The next time Jessica called, I tentatively told her how I was feeling. “I can’t stop thinking about you and how hard this must be,” I said, my voice cracking. “I know how sad you are…”
“I don’t want you to feel guilty,” Jessica admonished me. “I want you to love her. I need you to love her and be happy.”
“But how can I be happy when you’re hurting so much?” I asked.
“It’s easier when I think of you cherishing her,” she said. “I need you to do that for her and for me, too. I don’t regret this.”
I wanted it to make better sense. We didn’t find Madison languishing in a destitute orphanage. She didn’t come to us with a history of abuse and neglect. I didn’t know how to justify this great gift of her presence in our lives at the expense of her mother. If there just something I could hang it on, an obvious reason that Madison was better off with us — but there wasn’t. There was just the word of her first mother who said, “This is what I need to do.”
In my lowest moments, I would browse the list of adoptive parents on our agency’s Web site. One night, I happened upon a profile of a fantastic family, African-American professionals who ran a newspaper and had a daughter the same age as my son. They should have gotten Madison, I thought. They were better educated than me, had better jobs — and could give Madison the one thing I never could: a connection to the black community.
My friend Elisabeth, who used to do patient support at an abortion clinic, took me to task.
“This is a choice issue,” she told me. “You keep telling me how strong and smart Jessica is, but you’re second-guessing her. That’s not fair.”
“I just want us to both be winners in this,” I said.
“There is more than one way to be a winner here,” she replied. “Stop denigrating Jessica’s decision.”
I had been picturing the two of us balanced on opposite sides of a tipping scale. If one of us was the real mother, then the other one was not. If one of us was happy, then the other must be sad. But when I hung up with Elisabeth, I realized that I couldn’t ease Jessica’s struggle by taking it on as my own. Besides that’s not what Jessica wanted; she did not want her sorrow to color these first months of Madison’s life. It was my guilt that betrayed her, not my love for Madison.
When I stopped feeling so consumed by what Jessica had lost, I was able to find joy in what I gained, the everyday pleasures of parenting again — dressing my daughter, giving her a bath. Certainly, with that joy came vulnerability and the insecurity my worried friends predicted. Sometimes I don’t want to share Madison. Sometimes I want to feel that I am the only mother she has and will ever need. But even at it’s most challenging, I still believe in openness. How much easier it will be for our daughter, I think, to never have to search for her roots. She will never have to wonder why her first mother chose adoption; she can ask her.
Jessica lives in our city and visits when her busy life allows, which ends up being about once a month, and we e-mail and phone more often. A few weeks ago she came over and made us jerk chicken with mango salsa; she is studying to be a chef. We joked that now we know where Madison gets her enthusiastic love of good food. After dinner I shared the beginnings of this essay with her and we cried a bit together.
“I didn’t know it was so hard for you,” she said.
“Well,” I shrugged, helplessly. “I didn’t know how to tell you.”
Last summer Jessica and I took a trip to Washington together so Madison could meet her extended birth family. Jessica was hoping, in part, to show them that it had all worked out OK and that her decision to place Madison with us was a good one. As an interracial family already, the transracial aspect did not grieve them; it was the loss of this wondrous first grandchild to strangers. “When they see us together, how things are, they’ll understand,” Jessica assured me. Still we were both nervous.
The family reunion took place at a country club on a beautiful cool summer evening. It was amazing to meet people who looked like Jessica and thus just like Madison, too. I kept my camera ready. Madison, open and sunny, charmed everyone, and several people took me aside to thank me for making the trip. “It’s my pleasure,” I said honestly.
“She looks like her mother,” said someone admiringly, and I felt the discomfort the comment left in the room. “Yes, she does,” I rushed to say. “She has Jessica’s beautiful smile.” And they were generous with me, too. “Better ask your mommy,” said Jessica’s father when Madison reached for another slice of cake. Then he handed her to me although I know it pained him.
When the party spilled outdoors, Madison and Jessica wandered away to play in one of the sand traps on the club’s golf course. I stood on the edge and snapped a series of pictures — first Madison and Jessica crouching together to poke at the sand. Then Madison with her head thrown back to look up at Jessica while Jessica gazed down at her, smiling with great tenderness. Then a shot of Madison laughing and running away. Running toward me.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

New Staff at Choice Network!


Hello Choice Network Family!

I am excited to introduce myself, Katie Forbes as the new Adoption Advocate for Choice Network. It has been my dream to work with this organization since its inception two years ago. I am truly inspired by this organization’s commitment to empowering women and helping them decide what path is right for them- whether that be adoption, parenting, or termination. 

I grew up in the Cleveland suburb of Shaker Heights, Ohio. While I was growing up my family was very active with the foster care community, taking in over 30 special needs children over 20 years, and adopting 3 of them. Growing up in this community that was filled with different cultures and backgrounds inspired me to study people from around the world. 

I received my bachelors’ degree in Anthropology and a minor in International Relations and diplomacy from The Ohio State University. While completing my degree I worked as an ABA (Applied Behavioral Analysis) Therapist with children and teens diagnosed on the autism spectrum. I fell in love with the work that I was doing with the special needs population, and when I moved home to Cleveland post graduation I pursued work in the same field.

My pursuit led me to a position with a foster care agency in Cleveland working with children in the system that had severe emotional and behavioral barriers. Although aspects of this job were heartbreaking at times it showed me how amazingly resilient children can be.  Before joining Choice Network I worked as a benefits specialist with the YWCA of Columbus. The majority of this job was spent out in the community at homeless shelters advocating for and assisting the disabled homeless population. This is also where I had the privilege of meeting Molly Rampe and Joni Ogle. After two years of working with the homeless population I realized how much I missed working with foster care and adoption community, and as luck had it, I was fortunate enough to find work with Choice Network.

I look forward to assisting woman throughout their journey of giving the most amazing, brave, and selfless gift for their child and themselves.

Sincerely,
Katie
Adoption Advocate
Choice Network

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Choice Network's BIG Update

What a crazy few weeks it’s been for Choice Network! Since the last post in February, we welcomed babies number 13, 14 and 15! On top of that, we attended the ACN conference and made some amazing new connections. We also received the HRC All Children-All Families Seal of Recognition for adoption agencies presented by their Family Project President, Ellen Kahn.


We cannot believe we received this award already! Four months ago it was only a faint dream, and we were told it has taken some agencies as long as two years to complete the process.

To receive this award, HRC requires that you satisfactorily meet a minimum of ten “Benchmarks of Cultural Competency”. Some of these include:
-LGBT culturally competent client and employee non discrimination policies
-LGBT cultural competence employee training
-Holding professional partners to similar LGBT competence standards
-Editing, creating, and utilizing culturally sensitive and inclusive language for forms, marketing materials, etc.
-Creating and implementing LGBT specific family training.
This was not the easiest process, especially for such a small agency like ours. We don’t have a lot of extra hands to help with all the changes, but we rallied together and powered through with a lot of help from HRC, The Downs Group, and community support.
As a staff we traveled to Michigan to engage in the HRC's approved LGBT Cultural Competence training. We learned so much and met many like-minded individuals eager to do similar work in their areas. We changed all of our documents and policies and had to have them approved; we edited our website, and even created new brochures. One of our brochures was even signed by popular comedian Ross Mathews who is a staple on both The Tonight Show with Jay Leno and E!’s Chelsea Lately!
We also created a new training specifically to help LGBT families while they are on their unique adoption journey. This included a lot of help from the community including legal experts, LGBT marriage and family counselors, and advocates. We also had the privilege of placing with our first lesbian family. They are an amazing couple and fantastic parents- we are so happy for them!
Toward the end, everything happened so fast- we submitted our official completion document on Monday and by Thursday we were receiving the Seal of Recognition from the HRC Family Project President!
That alone was an amazing experience: joined by our colleagues, partners, friends and our first LGBT family, Ellen Kahn talked with us to hear our story, praised us for our work, and presented us with the Seal! She was fantastic and we felt so honored to have her take the time to meet and recognize us.
It was a whirlwind experience- we accomplished more then we had hoped in such a short amount of time and now we are excited about what is next for Choice Network! This summer we are looking forward to sharing our exciting news at Pride and in the fall we are honored to participate in a multidisciplinary LGBT family creation seminar!
Stay tuned, seems like there’s no stopping us now!
Love,
Your Choice Network family

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

What does a "good" family look like?

Hey guys- Samantha here again. 

In writing the previous post about open adoption, it really made me wonder: what does a ‘good’ family look like? Open adoption families have many different faces, and even for biological families it’s obviously no longer the 50’s vision of the ‘American Family’. Dads don’t always go to work all day, moms don’t always stay home, children don’t always come from their mother's bellies, parents don’t always stay married (or ever get married), families come in many different race and ethnicity combinations, there can be blended and step families and some children even have two mommies or two daddies. All of those possible kinds of families have what it takes to be a great family for a child in need of a home.

I was raised by a lesbian woman so I- of course- feel strongly about the parenting abilities of LGBT individuals and couples. However, when I got to thinking about families, I wanted to do some more research on the topic of LGBT parenting.

In Ohio there are about 18,100 same-sex households (this is an approximate 250% growth from 2006). Even more specifically, there are approximately 8,610 same-sex households in Columbus alone. That means almost 50% of the entire same-sex population in Ohio resides in Columbus.

In 2010 the American Community Survey reported that there were almost 600,000 same sex households in the United States, yet only about 17% reported having children in their home as opposed to about 45% of married and unmarried heterosexual households.  That results in a 28% difference between the two communities and here at Choice Network we would love to be a part of equaling those numbers out.  

In 2010, the United States had over 100,000 children still waiting for adoption. Of those 100,000, 60%- or 60,000- have already had their biological parents rights terminated.

Over the past decade or so research has repeatedly concluded that children raised by gay or lesbian individuals and/or couples are equal to children who are raised by one or more heterosexual parents in emotional, cognitive and social development. They most certainly fare better than the more than 100,000 children left waiting for a home every year within the foster care system.  Research has found there are no significant differences between heterosexual and homosexual parents in their parenting abilities, parenting attitudes or emotional stability.

Choice Network’s only priority is creating happy, healthy, stable and permanent families; and we are looking forward to working with more LGBT clients because two dads (or moms) are always better than none. :)


Sources
1.       Administration for Children and Families (June 2011). http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/stats_research/afcars/statistics/adoptfs_tbl8_2010.pdf
2.       The AFCARS Report. (January 2011). http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/stats_research/afcars/tar/report18.htm
3.       Center for American Progress, Family Equality Council, & Movement Advancement Project (October 2011).
http://lgbtmap.org/file/all-children-matter-full-report.pdf
4.       The Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute (2006). http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/publications/2006_Expanding_Resources_for_Children%20_March_.pdf
5.        Same-Sex Couples and the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual Population: New Estimates from the American Community Survey. (October 2006) http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8h08t0zf
6.       Same-Sex Couple Households (September 2011)

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Adoption Myths in the Media

Hi all, my name is Samantha and I am one of the new interns here at Choice
Network. My experience thus far has been so incredible and eye opening. Yet the
more experiences I gain with this amazing organization (and the amazing
people we have the privilege of working with), the more I am puzzled by where my
previous beliefs and stereotypes about the world of adoption originated. Then it
struck me: a lot of my previous assumptions were likely strongly influenced by
the media. Lately there have been a lot of popular TV shows with adoption plots,
including: Glee, Parenthood, Private Practice, Once Upon a Time and Modern Family,
as well as “reality” shows like 16 and Pregnant. Five of the six shows (83.3%)
mentioned have had a story line where the birth mother changes her mind to choose
either a different family or to choose parenting. In the experience of our agency so
far, only 8.3% of our birth moms have ever made that choice.

Once Upon a Time has been scrutinized for perpetuating many negative assumptions
about adoption, including presenting the birth and adoptive mothers as opposing
and even quite confrontational entities. The show puts the relationships between
the child and his two respective parents as mutually exclusive threats to each
other and encourages him to promote secrecy and lying. Additionally the show is
notorious for its use of negative adoption language, using phrases such as “threw
him out” and “unfit mother” rather then embracing the reality that adoption is a
thoughtful, loving, difficult choice that for many women, especially those choosing
open adoption, encompasses a lifelong and ever changing journey of creating and
maintaining balanced, harmonious relationships.

Glee also came under fire for one of their adoption story lines, so much so that
FOX TV was presented with a petition of over 2,500 signatures asking for public
service announcements to be aired speaking about the ‘reality of adoption’. In the
story line, a young birth mother changes her mind months after her adoption has
been completed and is portrayed as trying to sabotage the adoptive mother- going
so far as to plant fake evidence in her home and report her to children’s services.
Petitioners were most concerned that though this storyline is obviously dramatic and an
unrealistic situation it still promotes the ideas that adoption is temporary and that a
birth mother could potentially take the child ‘back’ when these are not true realities.

The most striking thing to me about all of these shows? There is never a
mention of choice counseling, grief counseling, or of matching. All of these elements
are crucial to the adoption process for everyone involved, and are processes that this agency makes great efforts to perfect, provide, and improve upon at every need and opportunity.

Though adoption is an intricate and multifaceted journey it is my new experience
and perspective that open adoption is a wonderful, beneficial, and beautiful choice. I am so happy to be a part of this team and I am looking forward to sharing more of my knowledge and experiences with others.

-Samantha

Sources:
-http://yourlife.usatoday.com/parenting-family/adoption/story/2011-10-30/Foxs-
Glee-has-harmful-adoption-story-petition-says/51004490/1

-http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/11/29/discourses-on-adoption-on-
once-upon-a-time/